Mauritius vs Puerto Rico: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius rank
98th
Puerto Rico rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Mauritius
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 98th and Puerto Rico ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9784 ha | 22.69 ha | 21.71 ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 6.27 ha | 6.27 ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 47.08 ha | 47.08 ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 12.84 ha | 12.84 ha | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Mauritius or Puerto Rico?
- Mauritius, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Mauritius and Puerto Rico?
- 0 ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Puerto Rico?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Puerto Rico rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Mauritius ranks 98th and Puerto Rico ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.