Mayotte vs Sri Lanka: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Mayotte
42.77 ha
in 2024
Sri Lanka
42.75 ha
in 2024
Mayotte rank
93rd
Sri Lanka rank
94th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Mayotte
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 42.77 ha against 42.75 ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.02 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mayotte ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 94th of 220 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mayotte | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8848 ha | 2,695 ha | 2,695 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 3,483 ha | 3,483 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 1,528 ha | 1,528 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 8.55 ha | 149.62 ha | 141.07 ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Mayotte or Sri Lanka?
- Mayotte, at 42.77 ha against 42.75 ha in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Mayotte and Sri Lanka?
- 0.02 ha, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mayotte and Sri Lanka rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Mayotte ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 94th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.