Namibia vs Norway: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia rank
98th
Norway rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Namibia
- Norway
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 98th and Norway ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99,564 ha | 375.33 ha | 99,189 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 16,889 ha | 1,032 ha | 15,857 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 19.26 ha | 99.27 ha | 80.01 ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Namibia or Norway?
- Namibia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Namibia and Norway?
- 0 ha, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Norway rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Namibia ranks 98th and Norway ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.