Namibia vs Puerto Rico: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia rank
98th
Puerto Rico rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Namibia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 98th and Puerto Rico ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99,564 ha | 22.69 ha | 99,541 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 16,889 ha | 6.27 ha | 16,883 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 19.26 ha | 47.08 ha | 27.82 ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 12.84 ha | 12.84 ha | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Namibia or Puerto Rico?
- Namibia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Namibia and Puerto Rico?
- 0 ha, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Puerto Rico?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Puerto Rico rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Namibia ranks 98th and Puerto Rico ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.