North Macedonia vs Serbia: Woody savanna — Burned Area
North Macedonia
3,848 ha
in 2024
Serbia
3,892 ha
in 2024
North Macedonia rank
58th
Serbia rank
57th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- North Macedonia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3,892 ha against 3,848 ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 44 ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 58th and Serbia ranks 57th of 220 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,155 ha | 3,468 ha | 1,313 ha | Serbia |
| 2010s | 872.8 ha | 1,559 ha | 686.2 ha | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1,371 ha | 1,338 ha | 33.86 ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, North Macedonia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 3,892 ha against 3,848 ha in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between North Macedonia and Serbia?
- 44 ha, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Serbia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- North Macedonia ranks 58th and Serbia ranks 57th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.