North Macedonia vs South Sudan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
North Macedonia
3,848 ha
in 2024
South Sudan
5,642 ha
in 2024
North Macedonia rank
58th
South Sudan rank
55th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- North Macedonia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 5,642 ha against 3,848 ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 1,794 ha.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.5 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 58th and South Sudan ranks 55th of 220 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 905.58 ha | 9,526 ha | 8,621 ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 1,371 ha | 6,843 ha | 5,472 ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, North Macedonia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 5,642 ha against 3,848 ha in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between North Macedonia and South Sudan?
- 1,794 ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and South Sudan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- North Macedonia ranks 58th and South Sudan ranks 55th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.