Norway vs Uzbekistan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha
in 2024
Norway rank
98th
Uzbekistan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Norway
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Norway ranks 98th and Uzbekistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 361.55 ha | 5,581 ha | 5,220 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 1,032 ha | 1,136 ha | 104.42 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 99.27 ha | 0 ha | 99.27 ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Norway or Uzbekistan?
- Norway, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Norway and Uzbekistan?
- 0 ha, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Uzbekistan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Norway ranks 98th and Uzbekistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.