Puerto Rico vs Slovenia: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Puerto Rico
0 ha
in 2024
Slovenia
0 ha
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
98th
Slovenia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Puerto Rico
- Slovenia
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Slovenia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 98th and Slovenia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.47 ha | 54.67 ha | 32.2 ha | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 6.27 ha | 30.08 ha | 23.81 ha | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 47.08 ha | 68.85 ha | 21.78 ha | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 12.84 ha | 167.84 ha | 155 ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Puerto Rico or Slovenia?
- Puerto Rico, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Puerto Rico and Slovenia?
- 0 ha, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Slovenia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Puerto Rico and Slovenia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Puerto Rico ranks 98th and Slovenia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.