Rwanda vs Turkmenistan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Rwanda
21.37 ha
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 ha
in 2024
Rwanda rank
96th
Turkmenistan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Rwanda
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 21.37 ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 96th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,842 ha | 329.01 ha | 3,513 ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 448.66 ha | 20.68 ha | 427.98 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 10.69 ha | 0 ha | 10.69 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 12.82 ha | 0 ha | 12.82 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Rwanda or Turkmenistan?
- Rwanda, at 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Rwanda and Turkmenistan?
- 21.37 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Turkmenistan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Rwanda ranks 96th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.