Serbia vs South Sudan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Serbia
3,892 ha
in 2024
South Sudan
5,642 ha
in 2024
Serbia rank
57th
South Sudan rank
55th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Serbia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 5,642 ha against 3,892 ha in Serbia, a difference of 1,750 ha.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.4 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 57th and South Sudan ranks 55th of 220 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,693 ha | 9,526 ha | 7,833 ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 1,338 ha | 6,843 ha | 5,506 ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Serbia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 5,642 ha against 3,892 ha in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Serbia and South Sudan?
- 1,750 ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and South Sudan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Serbia ranks 57th and South Sudan ranks 55th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.