Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Suriname
6,754 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
6,271 ha
in 2024
Suriname rank
53rd
Zimbabwe rank
54th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Suriname
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 6,754 ha against 6,271 ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 483 ha.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Suriname ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 220 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,245 ha | 167,022 ha | 165,778 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 658.81 ha | 29,024 ha | 28,365 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 265.02 ha | 7,984 ha | 7,719 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1,573 ha | 2,889 ha | 1,316 ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Suriname or Zimbabwe?
- Suriname, at 6,754 ha against 6,271 ha in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
- 483 ha, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Suriname ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.