Turkmenistan vs Uzbekistan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Turkmenistan
0 ha
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha
in 2024
Turkmenistan rank
98th
Uzbekistan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Turkmenistan
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Turkmenistan ranks 98th and Uzbekistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turkmenistan | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 329.01 ha | 5,581 ha | 5,252 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 20.68 ha | 1,136 ha | 1,116 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Turkmenistan or Uzbekistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan?
- 0 ha, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Turkmenistan ranks 98th and Uzbekistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.