Chile vs Ghana: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Chile
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
Ghana
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
44th
Ghana rank
46th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- Ghana
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in Ghana, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ghana ahead.
Chile ranks 44th and Ghana ranks 46th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Ghana in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0463 ha per person | 0.0453 ha per person | Ghana |
| 2000s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0095 ha per person | 0.0091 ha per person | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0012 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Chile or Ghana?
- Chile, at 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in Ghana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Chile and Ghana?
- 0 ha per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ghana?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Ghana rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 44th and Ghana ranks 46th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.