Chile vs Serbia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Chile
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
Serbia
0.0006 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
44th
Serbia rank
43rd
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.0006 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 43rd of 187 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Chile or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.0006 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Chile and Serbia?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 43rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.