Chile vs South Sudan: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Chile
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.0005 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
44th
South Sudan rank
45th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- South Sudan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 44th and South Sudan ranks 45th of 187 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0013 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Chile or South Sudan?
- Chile, at 0.0005 ha per person against 0.0005 ha per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Chile and South Sudan?
- 0 ha per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Chile and South Sudan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 44th and South Sudan ranks 45th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.