Colombia vs Montenegro: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Colombia
0.0004 ha per person
in 2024
Montenegro
0.0004 ha per person
in 2024
Colombia rank
48th
Montenegro rank
50th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Colombia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0.0004 ha per person against 0.0004 ha per person in Montenegro, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 48th and Montenegro ranks 50th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0025 ha per person | 0.0025 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Colombia |
| 2010s | 0.0015 ha per person | 0.0022 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Colombia or Montenegro?
- Colombia, at 0.0004 ha per person against 0.0004 ha per person in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Colombia and Montenegro?
- 0 ha per person, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Montenegro rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Colombia ranks 48th and Montenegro ranks 50th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.