Czechia vs Kazakhstan: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Czechia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
90th
Kazakhstan rank
90th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Czechia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 90th and Kazakhstan ranks 90th of 187 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0031 ha per person | 0.0031 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Czechia or Kazakhstan?
- Czechia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Czechia and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Kazakhstan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Czechia ranks 90th and Kazakhstan ranks 90th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.