Ecuador vs Malawi: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Ecuador
0.0006 ha per person
in 2024
Malawi
0.0011 ha per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
42nd
Malawi rank
39th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.0011 ha per person against 0.0006 ha per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0005 ha per person.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.8 times Ecuador's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 42nd and Malawi ranks 39th of 187 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0078 ha per person | 0.0076 ha per person | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0032 ha per person | 0.0031 ha per person | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0017 ha per person | 0.0015 ha per person | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Ecuador or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 0.0011 ha per person against 0.0006 ha per person in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Ecuador and Malawi?
- 0.0005 ha per person, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malawi?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Malawi rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 42nd and Malawi ranks 39th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.