Ecuador vs Serbia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Ecuador
0.0006 ha per person
in 2024
Serbia
0.0006 ha per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
42nd
Serbia rank
43rd
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0006 ha per person against 0.0006 ha per person in Serbia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 43rd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 0.0006 ha per person against 0.0006 ha per person in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 0 ha per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 43rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.