Egypt vs Mauritius: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Egypt
0 ha per person
in 2024
Mauritius
0 ha per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
90th
Mauritius rank
90th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Mauritius
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 90th and Mauritius ranks 90th of 187 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Egypt or Mauritius?
- Egypt, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Egypt and Mauritius?
- 0 ha per person, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Mauritius rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 90th and Mauritius ranks 90th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.