Estonia vs Kazakhstan: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Estonia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Estonia rank
90th
Kazakhstan rank
90th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Estonia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Estonia ranks 90th and Kazakhstan ranks 90th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0028 ha per person | 0.0027 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Estonia or Kazakhstan?
- Estonia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Estonia and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha per person, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Kazakhstan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Estonia ranks 90th and Kazakhstan ranks 90th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.