Georgia vs Jamaica: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Georgia
0.0002 ha per person
in 2024
Jamaica
0.0002 ha per person
in 2024
Georgia rank
62nd
Jamaica rank
60th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Georgia
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.0002 ha per person against 0.0002 ha per person in Georgia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 62nd and Jamaica ranks 60th of 187 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Georgia or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 0.0002 ha per person against 0.0002 ha per person in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Georgia and Jamaica?
- 0 ha per person, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Jamaica?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Jamaica rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Georgia ranks 62nd and Jamaica ranks 60th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.