Hungary vs Italy: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Hungary
0 ha per person
in 2024
Italy
0 ha per person
in 2024
Hungary rank
80th
Italy rank
77th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Hungary
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Hungary, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.4 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Italy ahead.
Hungary ranks 80th and Italy ranks 77th of 187 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Italy |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Italy |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Italy |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Hungary or Italy?
- Italy, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Hungary and Italy?
- 0 ha per person, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Italy?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Italy rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Hungary ranks 80th and Italy ranks 77th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.