Isle of Man vs Kazakhstan: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Isle of Man
0 ha per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Isle of Man rank
90th
Kazakhstan rank
90th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Isle of Man
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Isle of Man ranks 90th and Kazakhstan ranks 90th of 187 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0028 ha per person | 0.0028 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Isle of Man or Kazakhstan?
- Isle of Man, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Isle of Man and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha per person, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Isle of Man and Kazakhstan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Isle of Man ranks 90th and Kazakhstan ranks 90th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.