Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Kazakhstan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
90th
Namibia rank
90th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Namibia ranks 90th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0028 ha per person | 0.0668 ha per person | 0.064 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0093 ha per person | 0.009 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Kazakhstan or Namibia?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 0 ha per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Namibia ranks 90th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.