Lesotho vs Lithuania: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Lesotho
0 ha per person
in 2024
Lithuania
0 ha per person
in 2024
Lesotho rank
90th
Lithuania rank
90th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Lesotho
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 90th and Lithuania ranks 90th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0012 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0012 ha per person | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Lesotho or Lithuania?
- Lesotho, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Lesotho and Lithuania?
- 0 ha per person, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Lithuania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lesotho and Lithuania rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Lesotho ranks 90th and Lithuania ranks 90th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.