Malawi vs Peru: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Malawi
0.0011 ha per person
in 2024
Peru
0.001 ha per person
in 2024
Malawi rank
39th
Peru rank
40th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Malawi
- Peru
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.0011 ha per person against 0.001 ha per person in Peru, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 39th and Peru ranks 40th of 187 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0078 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0074 ha per person | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.0032 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0028 ha per person | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.0017 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0012 ha per person | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Malawi or Peru?
- Malawi, at 0.0011 ha per person against 0.001 ha per person in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Malawi and Peru?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Peru rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Malawi ranks 39th and Peru ranks 40th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.