Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Mauritius or Namibia?

Mauritius, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia as of 2024.

What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Mauritius and Namibia?

0 ha per person, with Mauritius ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?

35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritius vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita

Mauritius

0 ha per person

in 2024

Namibia

0 ha per person

in 2024

Mauritius rank

90th

Namibia rank

90th

Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time

Mauritius
Namibia

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per person.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 90th and Namibia ranks 90th of 187 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritius	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 ha per person	0.0611 ha per person	0.0611 ha per person	Namibia
2000s	0 ha per person	0.0093 ha per person	0.0093 ha per person	Namibia
2010s	0 ha per person	0 ha per person	0 ha per person	Namibia
2020s	0 ha per person	0 ha per person	0 ha per person	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per capita, Mauritius or Namibia?: Mauritius, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per capita between Mauritius and Namibia?: 0 ha per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per capita?: Mauritius ranks 90th and Namibia ranks 90th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-capita/mauritius/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-capita/mauritius/namibia/">Mauritius vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Unit: ha per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 189 places, 6,469 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.