China vs Ecuador: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre

China
0.0106 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.0136 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
57th
Ecuador rank
54th

Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Ecuador
00.020.040.060.08199020062023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0136 ha per square kilometre against 0.0106 ha per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.003 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times China's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.

China ranks 57th and Ecuador ranks 54th of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0151 ha per square kilometre 0.0086 ha per square kilometre 0.0065 ha per square kilometre China
2000s 0.0296 ha per square kilometre 0.0077 ha per square kilometre 0.0219 ha per square kilometre China
2010s 0.0126 ha per square kilometre 0.0146 ha per square kilometre 0.0021 ha per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0069 ha per square kilometre 0.018 ha per square kilometre 0.0111 ha per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, China or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0.0136 ha per square kilometre against 0.0106 ha per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between China and Ecuador?
0.003 ha per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ecuador?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Ecuador rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
China ranks 57th and Ecuador ranks 54th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Ecuador: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/china/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/china/ecuador/">China vs Ecuador: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,279 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.