China vs El Salvador: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre

China
0.0106 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.0103 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
57th
El Salvador rank
58th

Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • El Salvador
00.10.20.30.4199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0106 ha per square kilometre against 0.0103 ha per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0003 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.

China ranks 57th and El Salvador ranks 58th of 187 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0151 ha per square kilometre 0.0618 ha per square kilometre 0.0467 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0296 ha per square kilometre 0.0371 ha per square kilometre 0.0075 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0126 ha per square kilometre 0.122 ha per square kilometre 0.1094 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.0069 ha per square kilometre 0.0276 ha per square kilometre 0.0207 ha per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, China or El Salvador?
China, at 0.0106 ha per square kilometre against 0.0103 ha per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between China and El Salvador?
0.0003 ha per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and El Salvador?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and El Salvador rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
China ranks 57th and El Salvador ranks 58th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs El Salvador: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/china/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/china/el-salvador/">China vs El Salvador: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,279 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.