Namibia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre

Namibia
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
86th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
86th

Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.050.10.150.2199020062023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 86th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 86th of 187 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1209 ha per square kilometre 0.0069 ha per square kilometre 0.114 ha per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0205 ha per square kilometre 0.0099 ha per square kilometre 0.0106 ha per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, Namibia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Namibia, at 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between Namibia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 ha per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 86th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 86th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/namibia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/namibia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Namibia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,279 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.