Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre

Suriname
0.0033 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0036 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
73rd
Zimbabwe rank
71st

Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Suriname
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.81199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0036 ha per square kilometre against 0.0033 ha per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0003 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Suriname ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 187 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0078 ha per square kilometre 0.4317 ha per square kilometre 0.424 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0041 ha per square kilometre 0.075 ha per square kilometre 0.0709 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0017 ha per square kilometre 0.0206 ha per square kilometre 0.019 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0017 ha per square kilometre 0.0053 ha per square kilometre 0.0036 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre, Suriname or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0036 ha per square kilometre against 0.0033 ha per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
0.0003 ha per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
Suriname ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/">Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,279 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.