Botswana vs Cyprus: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Botswana
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cyprus
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Botswana rank
89th
Cyprus rank
89th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Botswana
- Cyprus
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Cyprus, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 89th and Cyprus ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Cyprus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Cyprus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | Botswana |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Botswana or Cyprus?
- Botswana, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Cyprus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Botswana and Cyprus?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cyprus?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Cyprus rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Botswana ranks 89th and Cyprus ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.