Chile vs Togo: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Chile
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Togo
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chile rank
56th
Togo rank
58th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Chile
- Togo
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Togo, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Togo ahead.
Chile ranks 56th and Togo ranks 58th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | Togo |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Togo |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Chile or Togo?
- Chile, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Togo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Chile and Togo?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Togo?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Togo rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Chile ranks 56th and Togo ranks 58th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.