Colombia vs Serbia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Colombia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Colombia rank
48th
Serbia rank
51st
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Colombia
- Serbia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 51st of 184 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Colombia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Colombia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Colombia or Serbia?
- Colombia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Colombia and Serbia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Serbia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Colombia ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 51st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.