Denmark vs France: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Denmark
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
France
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Denmark rank
89th
France rank
86th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Denmark
- France
How they compare
France currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Denmark, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
Across all 35 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 89th and France ranks 86th of 184 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | France |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | France |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | France |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Denmark or France?
- France, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Denmark and France?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and France?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and France rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Denmark ranks 89th and France ranks 86th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.