Denmark vs Latvia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Denmark
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Denmark rank
89th
Latvia rank
89th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Denmark
- Latvia
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Denmark or Latvia?
- Denmark, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Denmark and Latvia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Latvia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Denmark ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.