Denmark vs Norway: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Denmark
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Norway
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Denmark rank
89th
Norway rank
89th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Denmark
- Norway
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Norway, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 89th and Norway ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Norway |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Denmark or Norway?
- Denmark, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Denmark and Norway?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Norway rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Denmark ranks 89th and Norway ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.