Eritrea vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Namibia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
89th
Namibia rank
89th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Namibia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 89th and Namibia ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Namibia?
- Eritrea, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Namibia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 89th and Namibia ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.