Haiti vs Latvia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Haiti
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Haiti rank
89th
Latvia rank
89th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Haiti
- Latvia
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Haiti ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Haiti or Latvia?
- Haiti, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Haiti and Latvia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Haiti and Latvia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Haiti ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.