Iraq vs Kazakhstan: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Iraq
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iraq rank
89th
Kazakhstan rank
89th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Iraq
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 89th and Kazakhstan ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Iraq or Kazakhstan?
- Iraq, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Iraq and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Kazakhstan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Iraq ranks 89th and Kazakhstan ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.