Japan vs Mauritius: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Japan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mauritius
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Japan rank
88th
Mauritius rank
89th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Japan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Mauritius, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 88th and Mauritius ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Japan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Japan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Japan or Mauritius?
- Japan, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Japan and Mauritius?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Mauritius rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Japan ranks 88th and Mauritius ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.