Kenya vs Slovenia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Kenya
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Slovenia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kenya rank
87th
Slovenia rank
89th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Kenya
- Slovenia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Slovenia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 87th and Slovenia ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kenya |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kenya |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Kenya or Slovenia?
- Kenya, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Kenya and Slovenia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Slovenia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Slovenia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Kenya ranks 87th and Slovenia ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.