Mali vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Mali
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mali rank
89th
Namibia rank
89th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Mali
- Namibia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 89th and Namibia ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | Mali |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Mali |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Mali |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Mali or Namibia?
- Mali, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Mali and Namibia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mali and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Mali ranks 89th and Namibia ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.