Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Peru or Zimbabwe?

Zimbabwe, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Peru as of 2024.

What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Peru and Zimbabwe?

0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zimbabwe?

35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Peru vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP

Peru

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Peru rank

42nd

Zimbabwe rank

39th

Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time

Peru
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Peru, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Peru ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 184 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Peru	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2000s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2010s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2020s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Peru or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Peru as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Peru and Zimbabwe?: 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zimbabwe?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Peru and Zimbabwe rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?: Peru ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/peru/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/peru/zimbabwe/">Peru vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Unit: ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 6,239 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.