Philippines vs Serbia: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Philippines
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Philippines rank
52nd
Serbia rank
51st
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Philippines
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Philippines, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 52nd and Serbia ranks 51st of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Philippines |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Philippines or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Philippines and Serbia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Philippines and Serbia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Philippines ranks 52nd and Serbia ranks 51st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.