Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, South Africa or Uganda?

South Africa, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Uganda as of 2024.

What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between South Africa and Uganda?

0 ha per US$ of GDP, with South Africa ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uganda?

35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

South Africa vs Uganda: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP

South Africa

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Uganda

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

South Africa rank

37th

Uganda rank

38th

Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time

South Africa
Uganda

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Uganda, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.

South Africa ranks 37th and Uganda ranks 38th of 184 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	South Africa	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP	0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2000s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2010s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2020s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, South Africa or Uganda?: South Africa, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Uganda as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between South Africa and Uganda?: 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uganda?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do South Africa and Uganda rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?: South Africa ranks 37th and Uganda ranks 38th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Uganda: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/south-africa/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/south-africa/uganda/">South Africa vs Uganda: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Unit: ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 6,239 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.