South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP

South Africa
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
South Africa rank
37th
Zimbabwe rank
39th

Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
0000199020072024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

South Africa ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 184 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2000s 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
South Africa, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
0 ha per US$ of GDP, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
South Africa ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Unit
ha per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,239 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.