Australia and New Zealand vs France: Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Australia and New Zealand
-76.76 % change on previous year
in 2024
France
-80 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
80th
France rank
83rd

Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • France
0200400600199120072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports -76.76 % change on previous year against -80 % change on previous year in France, a difference of 3.24 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was France ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 80th and France ranks 83rd of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and France in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand France Difference Ahead
1990s 44.38 % change on previous year -2.53 % change on previous year 46.91 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2000s 16.18 % change on previous year 55.18 % change on previous year 39 % change on previous year France
2010s 42.16 % change on previous year 68.74 % change on previous year 26.58 % change on previous year France
2020s 71.93 % change on previous year 22.18 % change on previous year 49.75 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Australia and New Zealand or France?
Australia and New Zealand, at -76.76 % change on previous year against -80 % change on previous year in France as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Australia and New Zealand and France?
3.24 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and France?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and France rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 80th and France ranks 83rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs France: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/france/">Australia and New Zealand vs France: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,366 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.