Azerbaijan vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Azerbaijan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Azerbaijan rank
99th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
99th

Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
-2000200400600800199120072023

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1993 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 99th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and China, Hong Kong SAR in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1990s 39.48 % change on previous year 9.45 % change on previous year 30.04 % change on previous year Azerbaijan
2000s -19.38 % change on previous year 38.35 % change on previous year 57.73 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 104.14 % change on previous year -65.06 % change on previous year 169.2 % change on previous year Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Azerbaijan or China, Hong Kong SAR?
Azerbaijan, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Azerbaijan and China, Hong Kong SAR?
0 % change on previous year, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and China, Hong Kong SAR?
16 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2015.
How do Azerbaijan and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Azerbaijan ranks 99th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/azerbaijan/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/azerbaijan/china-hong-kong-sar/">Azerbaijan vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,366 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.